I just want to add, that I was not trying to pick on those non-paying markets who are well-edited and presented. I made a generalisation for the sake of the article. I’m talking about the enthusiast-produced magazine who’ll publish any story that’s been through a spell checker.
But correcting the main article is going to interrupt the narrative flow. So please accept this addendum as my combined qualification and apology. If I think of a better way of saying it in the next few days, I’ll update the article.